"Prejudice involves a pre-formed or unfair judgment, often about people or groups. Its contrasts emphasize impartiality, openness, equal treatment, and understanding. Useful choices include Fairness, Impartiality, Objectivity, and Open-mindedness.
Choosing the Best Contrast to “Prejudice”
Quick options:
- Fairness
- Impartiality
- Objectivity
- Open-mindedness
- Acceptance
- Tolerance
- Inclusivity
- Equity
- Respect
- Understanding
- Empathy
- Non-discrimination
- Even-handedness
Fairness
Use “Fairness” where the sentence reverses the sense of “Prejudice” associated with fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Example: A contrast with “Prejudice” becomes clearer when “Fairness” is used in a sentence about fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Impartiality
“Impartiality” is a useful counterpoint to “Prejudice” in writing concerned with fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Example: In a sentence where “Prejudice” points to fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment, “Impartiality” can signal the contrasting idea.
Objectivity
Choose “Objectivity” if the contrast turns on the idea of fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Example: An editor might choose “Objectivity” when reversing the sense of “Prejudice” in a passage about fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Open-mindedness
“Open-mindedness” works as an opposing term when “Prejudice” is being used for fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Example: For a context centred on fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives, “Open-mindedness” can move the meaning in the opposite direction from “Prejudice”.
Acceptance
The wording “Acceptance” can reverse the relevant sense of “Prejudice” where the topic is fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Example: A contrastive sentence may use “Acceptance” where “Prejudice” would otherwise express fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Tolerance
“Tolerance” is most useful as a contrast when the sentence makes fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives central.
Example: When the relevant sense of “Prejudice” is fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives, “Tolerance” can provide the opposing wording.
Inclusivity
Use “Inclusivity” to oppose “Prejudice” where the intended sense concerns fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment.
Example: In editing, “Inclusivity” is a plausible contrast when “Prejudice” is being used for fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment.
Equity
“Equity” can provide the opposite direction from “Prejudice” in a context involving fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment.
Example: A writer can set “Equity” against “Prejudice” when the sentence turns on fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment.
Respect
Choose “Respect” when the sentence is contrasting with “Prejudice” specifically around fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Example: Where “Prejudice” carries the idea of fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives, “Respect” can mark a useful reversal of meaning.
Understanding
“Understanding” belongs in this list because it can counter the sense of “Prejudice” tied to fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Example: The wording “Understanding” works as a contrast when the surrounding context involves fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Empathy
The opposition between “Empathy” and “Prejudice” is clearest where the context involves fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Example: A sentence opposing “Prejudice” may use “Empathy” if the intended issue is fits when the contrast concerns openness to people or perspectives.
Non-discrimination
“Non-discrimination” can function as a contextual antonym when “Prejudice” carries the sense of fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment.
Example: For the sense of “Prejudice” connected with fits when the contrast concerns fair participation and treatment, “Non-discrimination” can sit on the other side of the contrast.
Even-handedness
Use “Even-handedness” where the writer needs to shift away from “Prejudice” in the area of fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Example: An editor could use “Even-handedness” to oppose “Prejudice” in writing concerned with fits when the contrast concerns unbiased judgment.
Choosing the Right Contrast to “Prejudice”
"Impartiality", "objectivity", and "fairness" are strongest for decision-making; "open-mindedness" and "understanding" emphasize attitude; "non-discrimination" focuses on conduct.